Wafe said:
"The fact is that not everyone's basis for perfection is the same. Take my belief about the Bible.
The Bible says that it is inspired of God but it does not say HOW it is inspired of God. Tell me where the in the Bible does the word infallible appear? Where does it say that this is the criteria in which to measure it?"
"the criteria by which to measure it"?
I will be the first to admit that I am not a bible scholar. Nor do I care to be, for the very reason you give here:
"not everyone's basis for perfection is the same"
Take your belief in the bible . . .On a number of points, we can agree. That the bible is a very subjective and flawed document is one of them. You suggested, saying in one breath it is inspired of god, but then you seem to say the bible is imperfect and not infallible. So, if the bible is in fact inspired of god, are you suggesting that god is imperfect, too? Why would a perfect god publish an imperfect book and why would I bow to anyone making the kind of claims that people (in the bible and outside of it make about this god) if he is in fact less than perfect?
For purposes of staying on topic, (as the original question of this thread is, how can god be perfect?), I can only say that my knowledge of the bible and of its writers shows that the bible alsofrequently contradicts itself while its authors wrote various stories and interpretations of stories, often long after the original stories took place.
In other words, the bible writers were often transmitting an oral tradition of stories - some of which are factual and some of which are skewed.
On this point I also partially agree with you Wafe: that "the bible is a newspaper." I see it however as a bunch of newspapers though, a number of which are tabloids like the National Enquirer and such; it consists of newspapers with more than one editor, that have had many different runs over the millennia, and which eventually got put together in the format most of us recognize it in today.
By your own admission, the bible you "believe in" is flawed. Why wouldn't its main protagonist and/or author also be equally flawed?
I think that is the point of kidA's question, don't you?